Demographics details for Rochester, NY vs Indian trail, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rochester, NY vs Indian trail, NC.

Data Rochester Indian trail
Population 209,352 41,724
Median Age 32.9 years 36.1 years
Median Income $44,156 $95,101
Married Families 20.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 22% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.8

Population Comparison: Rochester vs Indian trail

  • In Rochester, the population is higher at 209,352, compared to 41,724 in Indian trail.
  • The median age in Indian trail is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 32.9 years in Rochester.
  • Indian trail has a higher median income of $95,101, compared to $44,156 in Rochester.
  • In Indian trail, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 20.0% in Rochester.
  • Rochester has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
  • The unemployment rate in Rochester is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.8% in Indian trail.

Demographics

Demographics Rochester vs Indian trail provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rochester Indian trail
Black 38 9
White 30 71
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 20 11
Two or More Races 8 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rochester vs Indian trail

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rochester at 38% compared to 9% in Indian trail.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Indian trail at 71% compared to 30% in Rochester.
  • The Asian population is larger in Rochester at 4% compared to 3% in Indian trail.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Rochester at 20% compared to 11% in Indian trail.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Rochester at 8% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rochester and Indian trail at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rochester Indian trail
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 15.3% 9.3%
Depression 28.0% 22.0%
Smoking 24.5% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 18.5%
Obesity 39.7% 31.2%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rochester vs Indian trail

  • More residents in Rochester report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.6% in Indian trail.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Rochester at 28.0% compared to 22.0% in Indian trail.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Rochester at 24.5% compared to 13.5% in Indian trail.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Indian trail at 18.5% compared to 13.7% in Rochester.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Rochester at 39.7% compared to 31.2% in Indian trail.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Rochester at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in Indian trail.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rochester Indian trail
No Schooling 1.8% (3,839) 0.7% (287)
High School Diploma 13.2% (27,564) 12.8% (5,353)
Less than High School 16.7% (34,961) 6.6% (2,761)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (40,707) 24.4% (10,201)

Education Levels Comparison: Rochester vs Indian trail

  • A higher percentage of residents in Rochester have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Indian trail.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rochester hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 12.8% in Indian trail.
  • More residents in Rochester have less than a high school education at 16.7% compared to 6.6% in Indian trail.
  • In Indian trail, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 19.4% in Rochester.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.