Demographics details for Rochester, NY vs Fredericksburg, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rochester, NY vs Fredericksburg, VA.

Data Rochester Fredericksburg
Population 209,352 28,757
Median Age 32.9 years 30.9 years
Median Income $44,156 $83,445
Married Families 20.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 22% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.9

Population Comparison: Rochester vs Fredericksburg

  • In Rochester, the population is higher at 209,352, compared to 28,757 in Fredericksburg.
  • Residents in Rochester have a higher median age of 32.9 years compared to 30.9 years in Fredericksburg.
  • Fredericksburg has a higher median income of $83,445, compared to $44,156 in Rochester.
  • In Fredericksburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 20.0% in Rochester.
  • Rochester has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 10% in Fredericksburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Rochester is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.9% in Fredericksburg.

Demographics

Demographics Rochester vs Fredericksburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rochester Fredericksburg
Black 38 21
White 30 54
Asian 4 4
Hispanic 20 12
Two or More Races 8 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rochester vs Fredericksburg

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rochester at 38% compared to 21% in Fredericksburg.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fredericksburg at 54% compared to 30% in Rochester.
  • Both Rochester and Fredericksburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Rochester at 20% compared to 12% in Fredericksburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fredericksburg at 9%, compared to 8% in Rochester.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rochester and Fredericksburg at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rochester Fredericksburg
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 15.3% 10.9%
Depression 28.0% 22.7%
Smoking 24.5% 15.2%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 16.2%
Obesity 39.7% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rochester vs Fredericksburg

  • More residents in Rochester report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.7% in Fredericksburg.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Rochester at 28.0% compared to 22.7% in Fredericksburg.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Rochester at 24.5% compared to 15.2% in Fredericksburg.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fredericksburg at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Rochester.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Rochester at 39.7% compared to 36.7% in Fredericksburg.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Rochester at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Fredericksburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rochester Fredericksburg
No Schooling 1.8% (3,839) 0.5% (140)
High School Diploma 13.2% (27,564) 10.6% (3,055)
Less than High School 16.7% (34,961) 7.2% (2,074)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (40,707) 25.5% (7,346)

Education Levels Comparison: Rochester vs Fredericksburg

  • A higher percentage of residents in Rochester have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.5% in Fredericksburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rochester hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 10.6% in Fredericksburg.
  • More residents in Rochester have less than a high school education at 16.7% compared to 7.2% in Fredericksburg.
  • In Fredericksburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.5% compared to 19.4% in Rochester.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.