Demographics details for Rochester, NY vs Clarksdale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rochester, NY vs Clarksdale, MS.
| Data | Rochester | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 209,352 | 13,969 |
| Median Age | 32.9 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $44,156 | $35,377 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 27% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Rochester vs Clarksdale
- In Rochester, the population is higher at 209,352, compared to 13,969 in Clarksdale.
- The median age in Clarksdale is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 32.9 years in Rochester.
- Rochester has a higher median income of $44,156 compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Rochester and Clarksdale at 20.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksdale at 27%, compared to 22% in Rochester.
- Clarksdale has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 5.3% in Rochester.
Demographics
Demographics Rochester vs Clarksdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rochester | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 86 |
| White | 30 | 9 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rochester vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 38% in Rochester.
- Rochester has a higher percentage of White residents at 30% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Rochester at 4% compared to 0% in Clarksdale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rochester at 20% compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rochester at 8% compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rochester and Clarksdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rochester | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 28.0% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rochester vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.1% in Rochester.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rochester at 28.0% compared to 20.8% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 24.5% in Rochester.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rochester at 13.7% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 39.7% in Rochester.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Rochester and Clarksdale at 19.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rochester | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (3,839) | 2.0% (274) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (27,564) | 9.2% (1,281) |
| Less than High School | 16.7% (34,961) | 15.2% (2,130) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (40,707) | 14.1% (1,964) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rochester vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.8% in Rochester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rochester hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents in Rochester have less than a high school education at 16.7% compared to 15.2% in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rochester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.