Demographics details for Rochester, NY vs Chesapeake, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rochester, NY vs Chesapeake, VA.
Data | Rochester | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
Population | 209,352 | 252,488 |
Median Age | 32.9 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $44,156 | $92,703 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Rochester vs Chesapeake
- The population in Chesapeake is higher at 252,488, compared to 209,352 in Rochester.
- The median age in Chesapeake is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 32.9 years in Rochester.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703, compared to $44,156 in Rochester.
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 20.0% in Rochester.
- Rochester has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- The unemployment rate in Rochester is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Rochester vs Chesapeake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rochester | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
Black | 38 | 29 |
White | 30 | 53 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 20 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rochester vs Chesapeake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rochester at 38% compared to 29% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chesapeake at 53% compared to 30% in Rochester.
- Both Rochester and Chesapeake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rochester at 20% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rochester at 8% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rochester and Chesapeake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rochester | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 10.0% |
Depression | 28.0% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 24.5% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 36.1% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rochester vs Chesapeake
- More residents in Rochester report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rochester at 28.0% compared to 20.9% in Chesapeake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rochester at 24.5% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chesapeake at 16.1% compared to 13.7% in Rochester.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rochester at 39.7% compared to 36.1% in Chesapeake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rochester at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rochester | Chesapeake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (3,839) | 0.8% (2,039) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (27,564) | 13.1% (33,024) |
Less than High School | 16.7% (34,961) | 7.0% (17,684) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (40,707) | 23.8% (60,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rochester vs Chesapeake
- A higher percentage of residents in Rochester have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rochester hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- More residents in Rochester have less than a high school education at 16.7% compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 19.4% in Rochester.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.