Demographics details for Rochester, NY vs Callaway, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rochester, NY vs Callaway, MN.
Data | Rochester | Callaway |
---|---|---|
Population | 209,352 | 173 |
Median Age | 32.9 years | 39.9 years |
Median Income | $44,156 | $50,000 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Rochester vs Callaway
- In Rochester, the population is higher at 209,352, compared to 173 in Callaway.
- The median age in Callaway is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 32.9 years in Rochester.
- Callaway has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $44,156 in Rochester.
- In Callaway, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 20.0% in Rochester.
- Rochester has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 8% in Callaway.
- The unemployment rate in Rochester is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.2% in Callaway.
Demographics
Demographics Rochester vs Callaway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rochester | Callaway |
---|---|---|
Black | 38 | Data is updating |
White | 30 | 46 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 20 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 33 |
Demographics Comparison: Rochester vs Callaway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rochester at 38% compared to 0% in Callaway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Callaway at 46% compared to 30% in Rochester.
- The Asian population is larger in Rochester at 4% compared to 0% in Callaway.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rochester at 20% compared to 5% in Callaway.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Callaway at 16%, compared to 8% in Rochester.
- In Callaway, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 0% in Rochester.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rochester | Callaway |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.7% |
Depression | 28.0% | 26.1% |
Smoking | 24.5% | 27.4% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 20.5% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 47.8% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rochester vs Callaway
- More residents in Rochester report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.8% in Callaway.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rochester at 28.0% compared to 26.1% in Callaway.
- Callaway has a higher smoking rate at 27.4% compared to 24.5% in Rochester.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Callaway at 20.5% compared to 13.7% in Rochester.
- Callaway has higher obesity rates at 47.8% compared to 39.7% in Rochester.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Callaway at 28.0% compared to 19.0% in Rochester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rochester | Callaway |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (3,839) | 0.6% (1) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (27,564) | 27.2% (47) |
Less than High School | 16.7% (34,961) | 22.0% (38) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (40,707) | 14.5% (25) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rochester vs Callaway
- A higher percentage of residents in Rochester have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Callaway.
- In Callaway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.2% compared to 13.2% in Rochester.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Callaway at 22.0%, compared to 16.7% in Rochester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rochester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 14.5% in Callaway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.