Demographics details for Rochester, MN vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rochester, MN vs Kings mountain, NC.
| Data | Rochester | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 121,878 | 11,638 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $83,973 | $45,301 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rochester vs Kings mountain
- In Rochester, the population is higher at 121,878, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
- The median age in Kings mountain is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 36.3 years in Rochester.
- Rochester has a higher median income of $83,973 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rochester at 41.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- The poverty level is identical in both Rochester and Kings mountain at 11%.
- Kings mountain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.8% in Rochester.
Demographics
Demographics Rochester vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rochester | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 25 |
| White | 72 | 68 |
| Asian | 8 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rochester vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 9% in Rochester.
- Rochester has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 68% in Kings mountain.
- The Asian population is larger in Rochester at 8% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rochester at 6% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rochester at 5% compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rochester and Kings mountain at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rochester | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.3% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 14.4% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rochester vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.9% in Rochester.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 22.6% in Rochester.
- Kings mountain has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 14.4% in Rochester.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rochester at 16.5% compared to 16.3% in Kings mountain.
- Kings mountain has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 29.9% in Rochester.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kings mountain at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Rochester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rochester | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (1,376) | 0.4% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 10.8% (13,215) | 21.7% (2,528) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (6,755) | 17.8% (2,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.9% (40,147) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rochester vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Rochester have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 10.8% in Rochester.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 5.5% in Rochester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rochester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.