Demographics details for Roberts, MT vs Stanchfield, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roberts, MT vs Stanchfield, MN.
Data | Roberts | Stanchfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 281 | 94 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 27.6 years |
Median Income | $76,688 | $64,583 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Roberts vs Stanchfield
- In Roberts, the population is higher at 281, compared to 94 in Stanchfield.
- Residents in Roberts have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 27.6 years in Stanchfield.
- Roberts has a higher median income of $76,688 compared to $64,583 in Stanchfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Roberts at 31.0% compared to 24.0% in Stanchfield.
- Roberts has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Stanchfield.
- Stanchfield has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Roberts.
Demographics
Demographics Roberts vs Stanchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Roberts | Stanchfield |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 17 |
White | 92 | 70 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Roberts vs Stanchfield
- In Stanchfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Roberts.
- Roberts has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 70% in Stanchfield.
- Both Roberts and Stanchfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Roberts and Stanchfield at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Roberts at 8% compared to 3% in Stanchfield.
- In Stanchfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 0% in Roberts.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Roberts | Stanchfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 10.2% |
Depression | 23.0% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 13.9% | 22.6% |
Binge Drinking | 23.3% | 20.4% |
Obesity | 29.4% | 36.0% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roberts vs Stanchfield
- In Stanchfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 14.7% in Roberts.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stanchfield at 23.9% versus 23.0% in Roberts.
- Stanchfield has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 13.9% in Roberts.
- Binge drinking is more common in Roberts at 23.3% compared to 20.4% in Stanchfield.
- Stanchfield has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 29.4% in Roberts.
- Disability percentages are higher in Roberts at 23.0% compared to 6.0% in Stanchfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Roberts | Stanchfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 12.8% (36) | 9.6% (9) |
Less than High School | 15.7% (44) | 38.3% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (56) | 5.3% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roberts vs Stanchfield
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Roberts and Stanchfield at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roberts hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 9.6% in Stanchfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stanchfield at 38.3%, compared to 15.7% in Roberts.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roberts hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 5.3% in Stanchfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.