Demographics details for Roberts, MT vs Parker, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roberts, MT vs Parker, KS.
| Data | Roberts | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 281 | 233 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $76,688 | $80,250 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 73.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Roberts vs Parker
- In Roberts, the population is higher at 281, compared to 233 in Parker.
- Residents in Roberts have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 37.8 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $80,250, compared to $76,688 in Roberts.
- In Parker, the percentage of married families is higher at 73.0%, compared to 31.0% in Roberts.
- Roberts has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Roberts and Parker at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Roberts vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roberts | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 92 | 78 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Roberts vs Parker
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Roberts and Parker at 0%.
- Roberts has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 78% in Parker.
- Both Roberts and Parker have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 0% in Roberts.
- Both Roberts and Parker have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roberts and Parker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roberts | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.3% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 29.4% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roberts vs Parker
- In Parker, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.7% in Roberts.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roberts at 23.0% compared to 22.1% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 13.9% in Roberts.
- Binge drinking is more common in Roberts at 23.3% compared to 18.4% in Parker.
- Parker has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 29.4% in Roberts.
- Disability percentages are higher in Roberts at 23.0% compared to 21.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roberts | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 5.6% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (36) | 37.8% (88) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (44) | 22.3% (52) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (56) | 11.6% (27) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roberts vs Parker
- In Parker, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.6% compared to 0.0% in Roberts.
- In Parker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.8% compared to 12.8% in Roberts.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parker at 22.3%, compared to 15.7% in Roberts.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roberts hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 11.6% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.