Demographics details for Roberts, MT vs Nampa, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roberts, MT vs Nampa, ID.
| Data | Roberts | Nampa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 281 | 110,951 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $76,688 | $67,346 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Roberts vs Nampa
- The population in Nampa is higher at 110,951, compared to 281 in Roberts.
- Residents in Roberts have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 33.5 years in Nampa.
- Roberts has a higher median income of $76,688 compared to $67,346 in Nampa.
- In Nampa, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 31.0% in Roberts.
- The poverty level is higher in Nampa at 10%, compared to 9% in Roberts.
- Nampa has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Roberts.
Demographics
Demographics Roberts vs Nampa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roberts | Nampa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 92 | 65 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Roberts vs Nampa
- In Nampa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Roberts.
- Roberts has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 65% in Nampa.
- In Nampa, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Roberts.
- Nampa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 0% in Roberts.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Nampa at 9%, compared to 8% in Roberts.
- In Nampa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Roberts.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roberts | Nampa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.3% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 29.4% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roberts vs Nampa
- In Nampa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.7% in Roberts.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Nampa at 24.0% versus 23.0% in Roberts.
- Nampa has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 13.9% in Roberts.
- Binge drinking is more common in Roberts at 23.3% compared to 15.2% in Nampa.
- Nampa has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 29.4% in Roberts.
- Disability percentages are higher in Roberts at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Nampa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roberts | Nampa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (1,011) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (36) | 14.8% (16,423) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (44) | 14.3% (15,852) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (56) | 12.6% (13,951) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roberts vs Nampa
- In Nampa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Roberts.
- In Nampa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 12.8% in Roberts.
- More residents in Roberts have less than a high school education at 15.7% compared to 14.3% in Nampa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roberts hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 12.6% in Nampa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.