Demographics details for Roberts, MT vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roberts, MT vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Roberts | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 281 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $76,688 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Roberts vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 281 in Roberts.
- Residents in Roberts have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Roberts has a higher median income of $76,688 compared to $71,367 in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 31.0% in Roberts.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 9% in Roberts.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 3.2% in Roberts.
Demographics
Demographics Roberts vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roberts | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 21 |
| White | 92 | 10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Roberts vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 0% in Roberts.
- Roberts has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Roberts.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 0% in Roberts.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 8% in Roberts.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Roberts.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roberts | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 13.9% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.3% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 29.4% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roberts vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.7% in Roberts.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roberts at 23.0% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 13.9% in Roberts.
- Binge drinking is more common in Roberts at 23.3% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 29.4% in Roberts.
- Disability percentages are higher in Roberts at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roberts | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (36) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (44) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (56) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roberts vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Roberts.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 12.8% in Roberts.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 15.7% in Roberts.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roberts hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.