Demographics details for Roaring spring, PA vs Scottsboro, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Roaring spring, PA vs Scottsboro, AL.

Data Roaring spring Scottsboro
Population 2,333 15,677
Median Age 36.1 years 41.7 years
Median Income $63,194 $49,287
Married Families 43.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 10% 16%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Roaring spring vs Scottsboro

  • The population in Scottsboro is higher at 15,677, compared to 2,333 in Roaring spring.
  • The median age in Scottsboro is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 36.1 years in Roaring spring.
  • Roaring spring has a higher median income of $63,194 compared to $49,287 in Scottsboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Roaring spring at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Scottsboro.
  • The poverty level is higher in Scottsboro at 16%, compared to 10% in Roaring spring.
  • The unemployment rate in Roaring spring is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Scottsboro.

Demographics

Demographics Roaring spring vs Scottsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Roaring spring Scottsboro
Black 1 5
White 91 88
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races 5 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Roaring spring vs Scottsboro

  • In Scottsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Roaring spring.
  • Roaring spring has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 88% in Scottsboro.
  • In Scottsboro, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Roaring spring.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Roaring spring and Scottsboro at 3%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Roaring spring at 5% compared to 3% in Scottsboro.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roaring spring and Scottsboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Roaring spring Scottsboro
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% 13.6%
Depression 25.5% 24.9%
Smoking 21.4% 20.6%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 15.4%
Obesity 34.7% 37.5%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Roaring spring vs Scottsboro

  • In Scottsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.2% in Roaring spring.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Roaring spring at 25.5% compared to 24.9% in Scottsboro.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Roaring spring at 21.4% compared to 20.6% in Scottsboro.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Roaring spring at 18.5% compared to 15.4% in Scottsboro.
  • Scottsboro has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 34.7% in Roaring spring.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scottsboro at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Roaring spring.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Roaring spring Scottsboro
No Schooling 0.4% (9) 1.4% (218)
High School Diploma 25.9% (605) 19.7% (3,093)
Less than High School 7.2% (168) 16.6% (2,597)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.5% (316) 17.3% (2,710)

Education Levels Comparison: Roaring spring vs Scottsboro

  • In Scottsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Roaring spring.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Roaring spring hold a high school diploma at 25.9% compared to 19.7% in Scottsboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Scottsboro at 16.6%, compared to 7.2% in Roaring spring.
  • In Scottsboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 13.5% in Roaring spring.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.