Demographics details for Roaring spring, PA vs Santee, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roaring spring, PA vs Santee, CA.
| Data | Roaring spring | Santee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,333 | 59,051 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 39.0 years |
| Median Income | $63,194 | $101,777 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Roaring spring vs Santee
- The population in Santee is higher at 59,051, compared to 2,333 in Roaring spring.
- The median age in Santee is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 36.1 years in Roaring spring.
- Santee has a higher median income of $101,777, compared to $63,194 in Roaring spring.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Roaring spring at 43.0% compared to 42.0% in Santee.
- Roaring spring has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Santee.
- The unemployment rate in Roaring spring is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.9% in Santee.
Demographics
Demographics Roaring spring vs Santee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roaring spring | Santee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 91 | 58 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Roaring spring vs Santee
- In Santee, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Roaring spring.
- Roaring spring has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 58% in Santee.
- In Santee, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Roaring spring.
- Santee has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 3% in Roaring spring.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Santee at 14%, compared to 5% in Roaring spring.
- In Santee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Roaring spring.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roaring spring | Santee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 20.5% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 23.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roaring spring vs Santee
- More residents in Roaring spring report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.3% in Santee.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roaring spring at 25.5% compared to 19.2% in Santee.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Roaring spring at 21.4% compared to 11.5% in Santee.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Santee at 20.5% compared to 18.5% in Roaring spring.
- Obesity rates are higher in Roaring spring at 34.7% compared to 23.7% in Santee.
- Disability percentages are higher in Roaring spring at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Santee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roaring spring | Santee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (9) | 1.1% (655) |
| High School Diploma | 25.9% (605) | 13.0% (7,650) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (168) | 9.2% (5,411) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (316) | 22.4% (13,238) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roaring spring vs Santee
- In Santee, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Roaring spring.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roaring spring hold a high school diploma at 25.9% compared to 13.0% in Santee.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santee at 9.2%, compared to 7.2% in Roaring spring.
- In Santee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.4% compared to 13.5% in Roaring spring.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.