Demographics details for Roaring spring, PA vs Loretto, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Roaring spring, PA vs Loretto, KY.

Data Roaring spring Loretto
Population 2,333 716
Median Age 36.1 years 44.8 years
Median Income $63,194 $49,688
Married Families 43.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Roaring spring vs Loretto

  • In Roaring spring, the population is higher at 2,333, compared to 716 in Loretto.
  • The median age in Loretto is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 36.1 years in Roaring spring.
  • Roaring spring has a higher median income of $63,194 compared to $49,688 in Loretto.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Roaring spring at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Loretto.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Roaring spring and Loretto at 10%.
  • The unemployment rate in Roaring spring is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Loretto.

Demographics

Demographics Roaring spring vs Loretto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Roaring spring Loretto
Black 1 1
White 91 99
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Roaring spring vs Loretto

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Roaring spring and Loretto at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Loretto at 99% compared to 91% in Roaring spring.
  • Both Roaring spring and Loretto have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Roaring spring at 3% compared to 0% in Loretto.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Roaring spring at 5% compared to 0% in Loretto.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roaring spring and Loretto at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Roaring spring Loretto
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% 19.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% 14.6%
Depression 25.5% 28.6%
Smoking 21.4% 24.3%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 15.4%
Obesity 34.7% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Roaring spring vs Loretto

  • In Loretto, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.2% in Roaring spring.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Loretto at 28.6% versus 25.5% in Roaring spring.
  • Loretto has a higher smoking rate at 24.3% compared to 21.4% in Roaring spring.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Roaring spring at 18.5% compared to 15.4% in Loretto.
  • Loretto has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 34.7% in Roaring spring.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loretto at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Roaring spring.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Roaring spring Loretto
No Schooling 0.4% (9) 3.4% (24)
High School Diploma 25.9% (605) 27.2% (195)
Less than High School 7.2% (168) 23.2% (166)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.5% (316) 5.4% (39)

Education Levels Comparison: Roaring spring vs Loretto

  • In Loretto, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.4% in Roaring spring.
  • In Loretto, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.2% compared to 25.9% in Roaring spring.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Loretto at 23.2%, compared to 7.2% in Roaring spring.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Roaring spring hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 5.4% in Loretto.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.