Demographics details for Roaring river, NC vs Mesa, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roaring river, NC vs Mesa, AZ.
Data | Roaring river | Mesa |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,000 | 512,498 |
Median Age | 35.0 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $60,000 | $73,766 |
Married Families | 500.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Roaring river vs Mesa
- The population in Mesa is higher at 512,498, compared to 1,000 in Roaring river.
- The median age in Mesa is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 35.0 years in Roaring river.
- Mesa has a higher median income of $73,766, compared to $60,000 in Roaring river.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Roaring river at 500.0% compared to 38.0% in Mesa.
- Roaring river has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Mesa.
- The unemployment rate in Roaring river is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Mesa.
Demographics
Demographics Roaring river vs Mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Roaring river | Mesa |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 5 |
White | 90 | 52 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Roaring river vs Mesa
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Roaring river and Mesa at 5%.
- Roaring river has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 52% in Mesa.
- Both Roaring river and Mesa have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Mesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 2% in Roaring river.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mesa at 12%, compared to 1% in Roaring river.
- In Mesa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Roaring river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Roaring river | Mesa |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.2% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 20.4% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 17.8% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 31.6% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roaring river vs Mesa
- In Mesa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mesa at 20.4% versus 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Mesa has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mesa at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Mesa has higher obesity rates at 31.6% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mesa at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Roaring river | Mesa |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (6,008) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.8% (70,489) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.9% (60,898) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 19.9% (102,124) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roaring river vs Mesa
- In Mesa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- In Mesa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mesa at 11.9%, compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- In Mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.