Demographics details for Roaring river, NC vs Kaysville, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Roaring river, NC vs Kaysville, UT.

Data Roaring river Kaysville
Population 1,000 32,761
Median Age 35.0 years 32.1 years
Median Income $60,000 $121,867
Married Families 500.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.7

Population Comparison: Roaring river vs Kaysville

  • The population in Kaysville is higher at 32,761, compared to 1,000 in Roaring river.
  • Residents in Roaring river have a higher median age of 35.0 years compared to 32.1 years in Kaysville.
  • Kaysville has a higher median income of $121,867, compared to $60,000 in Roaring river.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Roaring river at 500.0% compared to 45.0% in Kaysville.
  • Roaring river has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
  • The unemployment rate in Roaring river is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.7% in Kaysville.

Demographics

Demographics Roaring river vs Kaysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Roaring river Kaysville
Black 5 Data is updating
White 90 88
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 2 5
Two or More Races 1 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Roaring river vs Kaysville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Roaring river at 5% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
  • Roaring river has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 88% in Kaysville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Roaring river at 2% compared to 1% in Kaysville.
  • Kaysville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Roaring river.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kaysville at 6%, compared to 1% in Roaring river.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roaring river and Kaysville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Roaring river Kaysville
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 8.7%
Depression Data is updating% 23.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 6.7%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 11.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 31.6%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Roaring river vs Kaysville

  • In Kaysville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Kaysville at 23.7% versus 0.0% in Roaring river.
  • Kaysville has a higher smoking rate at 6.7% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Kaysville at 11.4% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
  • Kaysville has higher obesity rates at 31.6% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kaysville at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Roaring river Kaysville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (141)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.1% (1,986)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.6% (859)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 28.5% (9,340)

Education Levels Comparison: Roaring river vs Kaysville

  • In Kaysville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
  • In Kaysville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 6.1% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kaysville at 2.6%, compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
  • In Kaysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.