Demographics details for Roanoke, VA vs Grand junction, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Roanoke, VA vs Grand junction, CO.

Data Roanoke Grand junction
Population 97,847 68,034
Median Age 38.1 years 39.9 years
Median Income $51,523 $62,993
Married Families 28.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 4.7

Population Comparison: Roanoke vs Grand junction

  • In Roanoke, the population is higher at 97,847, compared to 68,034 in Grand junction.
  • The median age in Grand junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 38.1 years in Roanoke.
  • Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993, compared to $51,523 in Roanoke.
  • In Grand junction, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 28.0% in Roanoke.
  • Roanoke has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.3% in Roanoke.

Demographics

Demographics Roanoke vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Roanoke Grand junction
Black 30 1
White 53 73
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 7 16
Two or More Races 7 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Roanoke vs Grand junction

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Roanoke at 30% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand junction at 73% compared to 53% in Roanoke.
  • The Asian population is larger in Roanoke at 3% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 7% in Roanoke.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand junction at 8%, compared to 7% in Roanoke.
  • In Grand junction, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Roanoke.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Roanoke Grand junction
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 11.8%
Depression 25.3% 24.5%
Smoking 21.4% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 19.2%
Obesity 41.2% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Roanoke vs Grand junction

  • More residents in Roanoke report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.8% in Grand junction.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Roanoke at 25.3% compared to 24.5% in Grand junction.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Roanoke at 21.4% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 16.4% in Roanoke.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Roanoke at 41.2% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Roanoke.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Roanoke Grand junction
No Schooling 1.0% (959) 0.4% (245)
High School Diploma 19.7% (19,319) 13.9% (9,476)
Less than High School 12.3% (11,988) 9.7% (6,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.2% (19,786) 23.8% (16,201)

Education Levels Comparison: Roanoke vs Grand junction

  • A higher percentage of residents in Roanoke have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Roanoke hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • More residents in Roanoke have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
  • In Grand junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 20.2% in Roanoke.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.