Demographics details for Roanoke rapids, NC vs Sugar grove, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Roanoke rapids, NC vs Sugar grove, PA.

Data Roanoke rapids Sugar grove
Population 14,856 546
Median Age 40.5 years 42.2 years
Median Income $45,732 $68,056
Married Families 34.0% 53.0%
Poverty Level 18% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.8 4.2

Population Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Sugar grove

  • In Roanoke rapids, the population is higher at 14,856, compared to 546 in Sugar grove.
  • The median age in Sugar grove is higher at 42.2 years, compared to 40.5 years in Roanoke rapids.
  • Sugar grove has a higher median income of $68,056, compared to $45,732 in Roanoke rapids.
  • In Sugar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 34.0% in Roanoke rapids.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 8% in Sugar grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Roanoke rapids is higher at 5.8%, compared to 4.2% in Sugar grove.

Demographics

Demographics Roanoke rapids vs Sugar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Roanoke rapids Sugar grove
Black 35 1
White 50 79
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 6
Two or More Races 7 14
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Sugar grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Roanoke rapids at 35% compared to 1% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sugar grove at 79% compared to 50% in Roanoke rapids.
  • The Asian population is larger in Roanoke rapids at 1% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Roanoke rapids and Sugar grove at 6%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sugar grove at 14%, compared to 7% in Roanoke rapids.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Roanoke rapids at 1% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Roanoke rapids Sugar grove
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 13.2%
Depression 24.6% 23.5%
Smoking 21.4% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 18.2%
Obesity 39.1% 38.8%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Sugar grove

  • More residents in Roanoke rapids report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.3% in Sugar grove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Roanoke rapids at 24.6% compared to 23.5% in Sugar grove.
  • Sugar grove has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 21.4% in Roanoke rapids.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sugar grove at 18.2% compared to 15.1% in Roanoke rapids.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Roanoke rapids at 39.1% compared to 38.8% in Sugar grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Roanoke rapids at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Sugar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Roanoke rapids Sugar grove
No Schooling 0.6% (93) 1.5% (8)
High School Diploma 20.5% (3,040) 28.2% (154)
Less than High School 14.5% (2,156) 6.2% (34)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.7% (2,326) 13.0% (71)

Education Levels Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Sugar grove

  • In Sugar grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.6% in Roanoke rapids.
  • In Sugar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.2% compared to 20.5% in Roanoke rapids.
  • More residents in Roanoke rapids have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 6.2% in Sugar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Roanoke rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 13.0% in Sugar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.