Demographics details for Roanoke rapids, NC vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roanoke rapids, NC vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Roanoke rapids | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,856 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $45,732 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 14,856 in Roanoke rapids.
- Residents in Roanoke rapids have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $45,732 in Roanoke rapids.
- In Fontana, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Roanoke rapids.
- Roanoke rapids has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 13% in Fontana.
- The unemployment rate in Roanoke rapids is higher at 5.8%, compared to 5.0% in Fontana.
Demographics
Demographics Roanoke rapids vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roanoke rapids | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 8 |
| White | 50 | 2 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Fontana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Roanoke rapids at 35% compared to 8% in Fontana.
- Roanoke rapids has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Roanoke rapids.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 6% in Roanoke rapids.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 7% in Roanoke rapids.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roanoke rapids and Fontana at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roanoke rapids | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Fontana
- More residents in Roanoke rapids report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roanoke rapids at 24.6% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Roanoke rapids at 21.4% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Roanoke rapids and Fontana at 15.1%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Roanoke rapids at 39.1% compared to 38.6% in Fontana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Roanoke rapids at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roanoke rapids | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (93) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 20.5% (3,040) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (2,156) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (2,326) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.6% in Roanoke rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roanoke rapids hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 14.5% in Roanoke rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roanoke rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.