Demographics details for Roanoke rapids, NC vs Cresco, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Roanoke rapids, NC vs Cresco, PA.

Data Roanoke rapids Cresco
Population 14,856 1,811
Median Age 40.5 years 38.0 years
Median Income $45,732 $71,250
Married Families 34.0% 48.0%
Poverty Level 18% 11%
Unemployment Rate 5.8 4.5

Population Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Cresco

  • In Roanoke rapids, the population is higher at 14,856, compared to 1,811 in Cresco.
  • Residents in Roanoke rapids have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 38.0 years in Cresco.
  • Cresco has a higher median income of $71,250, compared to $45,732 in Roanoke rapids.
  • In Cresco, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 34.0% in Roanoke rapids.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 11% in Cresco.
  • The unemployment rate in Roanoke rapids is higher at 5.8%, compared to 4.5% in Cresco.

Demographics

Demographics Roanoke rapids vs Cresco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Roanoke rapids Cresco
Black 35 2
White 50 95
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 6 2
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Cresco

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Roanoke rapids at 35% compared to 2% in Cresco.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cresco at 95% compared to 50% in Roanoke rapids.
  • Both Roanoke rapids and Cresco have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Roanoke rapids at 6% compared to 2% in Cresco.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Roanoke rapids at 7% compared to 0% in Cresco.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Roanoke rapids at 1% compared to 0% in Cresco.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Roanoke rapids Cresco
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% Data is updating%
Depression 24.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 21.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 39.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 20.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Cresco

  • More residents in Roanoke rapids report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Roanoke rapids at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Roanoke rapids at 21.4% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Roanoke rapids at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Roanoke rapids at 39.1% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Roanoke rapids at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Roanoke rapids Cresco
No Schooling 0.6% (93) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 20.5% (3,040) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 14.5% (2,156) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.7% (2,326) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Cresco

  • A higher percentage of residents in Roanoke rapids have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Roanoke rapids hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
  • More residents in Roanoke rapids have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Roanoke rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.