Demographics details for Roanoke rapids, NC vs Churdan, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roanoke rapids, NC vs Churdan, IA.
| Data | Roanoke rapids | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,856 | 363 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $45,732 | $58,125 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Churdan
- In Roanoke rapids, the population is higher at 14,856, compared to 363 in Churdan.
- Residents in Roanoke rapids have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 28.8 years in Churdan.
- Churdan has a higher median income of $58,125, compared to $45,732 in Roanoke rapids.
- In Churdan, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 34.0% in Roanoke rapids.
- Roanoke rapids has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Churdan.
- The unemployment rate in Roanoke rapids is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.0% in Churdan.
Demographics
Demographics Roanoke rapids vs Churdan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roanoke rapids | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 1 |
| White | 50 | 87 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Churdan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Roanoke rapids at 35% compared to 1% in Churdan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Churdan at 87% compared to 50% in Roanoke rapids.
- In Churdan, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Roanoke rapids.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Roanoke rapids at 6% compared to 2% in Churdan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Roanoke rapids at 7% compared to 5% in Churdan.
- In Churdan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Roanoke rapids.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roanoke rapids | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 21.1% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Churdan
- More residents in Roanoke rapids report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.2% in Churdan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roanoke rapids at 24.6% compared to 19.7% in Churdan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Roanoke rapids at 21.4% compared to 18.3% in Churdan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Churdan at 21.1% compared to 15.1% in Roanoke rapids.
- Obesity rates are higher in Roanoke rapids at 39.1% compared to 36.4% in Churdan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Churdan at 25.0% compared to 20.0% in Roanoke rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roanoke rapids | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (93) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 20.5% (3,040) | 30.6% (111) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (2,156) | 12.7% (46) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (2,326) | 11.6% (42) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roanoke rapids vs Churdan
- A higher percentage of residents in Roanoke rapids have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Churdan.
- In Churdan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.6% compared to 20.5% in Roanoke rapids.
- More residents in Roanoke rapids have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 12.7% in Churdan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roanoke rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 11.6% in Churdan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.