Demographics details for Roachdale, IN vs Shabbona, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roachdale, IN vs Shabbona, IL.
Data | Roachdale | Shabbona |
---|---|---|
Population | 852 | 850 |
Median Age | 32.9 years | 53.7 years |
Median Income | $63,088 | $60,625 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Roachdale vs Shabbona
- In Roachdale, the population is higher at 852, compared to 850 in Shabbona.
- The median age in Shabbona is higher at 53.7 years, compared to 32.9 years in Roachdale.
- Roachdale has a higher median income of $63,088 compared to $60,625 in Shabbona.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Roachdale and Shabbona at 34.0%.
- Roachdale has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Shabbona.
- Shabbona has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Roachdale.
Demographics
Demographics Roachdale vs Shabbona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Roachdale | Shabbona |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 95 | 94 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Roachdale vs Shabbona
- In Shabbona, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Roachdale.
- Roachdale has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 94% in Shabbona.
- Both Roachdale and Shabbona have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Roachdale at 5% compared to 3% in Shabbona.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shabbona at 2%, compared to 0% in Roachdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roachdale and Shabbona at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Roachdale | Shabbona |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 10.5% |
Depression | 26.6% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 22.0% | 16.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 36.7% | 36.3% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roachdale vs Shabbona
- More residents in Roachdale report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.2% in Shabbona.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roachdale at 26.6% compared to 22.1% in Shabbona.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Roachdale at 22.0% compared to 16.5% in Shabbona.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shabbona at 18.8% compared to 17.1% in Roachdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Roachdale at 36.7% compared to 36.3% in Shabbona.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shabbona at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in Roachdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Roachdale | Shabbona |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.8% (152) | 22.1% (188) |
Less than High School | 17.1% (146) | 7.6% (65) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (97) | 12.2% (104) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roachdale vs Shabbona
- A higher percentage of residents in Roachdale have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Shabbona.
- In Shabbona, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 17.8% in Roachdale.
- More residents in Roachdale have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 7.6% in Shabbona.
- In Shabbona, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 11.4% in Roachdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.