Demographics details for Riverton, UT vs Washington, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverton, UT vs Washington, IN.
Data | Riverton | Washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 44,599 | 12,171 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $115,869 | $48,255 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Riverton vs Washington
- In Riverton, the population is higher at 44,599, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 33.4 years in Riverton.
- Riverton has a higher median income of $115,869 compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Riverton at 46.0% compared to 38.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 12%, compared to 6% in Riverton.
- The unemployment rate in Riverton is higher at 3.3%, compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Riverton vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Riverton | Washington |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 4 |
White | 81 | 76 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 11 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riverton vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Riverton.
- Riverton has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 76% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverton at 3% compared to 0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 11% in Riverton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 8%, compared to 4% in Riverton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Riverton at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Riverton | Washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 13.5% |
Depression | 27.1% | 27.6% |
Smoking | 7.9% | 23.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 28.9% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverton vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.2% in Riverton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 27.6% versus 27.1% in Riverton.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 7.9% in Riverton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Riverton at 17.0% compared to 16.3% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 28.9% in Riverton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Riverton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Riverton | Washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (526) | 1.3% (163) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (5,043) | 22.8% (2,771) |
Less than High School | 9.0% (4,024) | 20.2% (2,460) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.8% (10,164) | 9.3% (1,129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverton vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Riverton.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 11.3% in Riverton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 20.2%, compared to 9.0% in Riverton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.