Demographics details for Riverside, CA vs Pittsburg, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverside, CA vs Pittsburg, KS.
| Data | Riverside | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 320,764 | 20,658 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 25.7 years |
| Median Income | $83,448 | $42,371 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Riverside vs Pittsburg
- In Riverside, the population is higher at 320,764, compared to 20,658 in Pittsburg.
- Residents in Riverside have a higher median age of 32.4 years compared to 25.7 years in Pittsburg.
- Riverside has a higher median income of $83,448 compared to $42,371 in Pittsburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Riverside at 33.0% compared to 28.0% in Pittsburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Pittsburg at 23%, compared to 12% in Riverside.
- The unemployment rate in Riverside is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.1% in Pittsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Riverside vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Riverside | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 3 |
| White | 18 | 78 |
| Asian | 8 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 55 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riverside vs Pittsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Riverside at 6% compared to 3% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsburg at 78% compared to 18% in Riverside.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverside at 8% compared to 3% in Pittsburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riverside at 55% compared to 11% in Pittsburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Riverside at 12% compared to 5% in Pittsburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Riverside at 1% compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Riverside | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 17.1% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverside vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.0% in Riverside.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pittsburg at 25.0% versus 17.1% in Riverside.
- Pittsburg has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 13.2% in Riverside.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pittsburg at 19.7% compared to 16.1% in Riverside.
- Pittsburg has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 36.2% in Riverside.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pittsburg at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverside.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Riverside | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (6,286) | 0.7% (150) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (50,271) | 13.0% (2,686) |
| Less than High School | 20.3% (64,976) | 5.9% (1,222) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (47,929) | 17.2% (3,562) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverside vs Pittsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverside have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.7% in Pittsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverside hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
- More residents in Riverside have less than a high school education at 20.3% compared to 5.9% in Pittsburg.
- In Pittsburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 14.9% in Riverside.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.