Demographics details for Riverside, CA vs Falconer, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverside, CA vs Falconer, NY.
| Data | Riverside | Falconer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 320,764 | 2,262 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 46.4 years |
| Median Income | $83,448 | $50,625 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Riverside vs Falconer
- In Riverside, the population is higher at 320,764, compared to 2,262 in Falconer.
- The median age in Falconer is higher at 46.4 years, compared to 32.4 years in Riverside.
- Riverside has a higher median income of $83,448 compared to $50,625 in Falconer.
- In Falconer, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Riverside.
- Riverside has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Falconer.
- The unemployment rate in Riverside is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.5% in Falconer.
Demographics
Demographics Riverside vs Falconer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Riverside | Falconer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 18 | 99 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 55 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riverside vs Falconer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Riverside at 6% compared to 0% in Falconer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Falconer at 99% compared to 18% in Riverside.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverside at 8% compared to 0% in Falconer.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riverside at 55% compared to 0% in Falconer.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Riverside at 12% compared to 1% in Falconer.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Riverside at 1% compared to 0% in Falconer.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Riverside | Falconer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 17.1% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverside vs Falconer
- In Falconer, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.0% in Riverside.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Falconer at 26.7% versus 17.1% in Riverside.
- Falconer has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 13.2% in Riverside.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Falconer at 18.6% compared to 16.1% in Riverside.
- Falconer has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 36.2% in Riverside.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Falconer at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverside.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Riverside | Falconer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (6,286) | 0.2% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (50,271) | 20.2% (458) |
| Less than High School | 20.3% (64,976) | 13.0% (294) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (47,929) | 10.5% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverside vs Falconer
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverside have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.2% in Falconer.
- In Falconer, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 15.7% in Riverside.
- More residents in Riverside have less than a high school education at 20.3% compared to 13.0% in Falconer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverside hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 10.5% in Falconer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.