Demographics details for Riverhead, NY vs Lancaster, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Riverhead, NY vs Lancaster, VA.

Data Riverhead Lancaster
Population 33,539 10,750
Median Age 42.0 years 59.2 years
Median Income $80,000 $62,674
Married Families 60.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 7% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 3.1

Population Comparison: Riverhead vs Lancaster

  • In Riverhead, the population is higher at 33,539, compared to 10,750 in Lancaster.
  • The median age in Lancaster is higher at 59.2 years, compared to 42.0 years in Riverhead.
  • Riverhead has a higher median income of $80,000 compared to $62,674 in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Riverhead at 60.0% compared to 46.0% in Lancaster.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 10%, compared to 7% in Riverhead.
  • The unemployment rate in Riverhead is higher at 3.3%, compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.

Demographics

Demographics Riverhead vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Riverhead Lancaster
Black 10 28
White 70 66
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 15 2
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Riverhead vs Lancaster

  • In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 10% in Riverhead.
  • Riverhead has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 66% in Lancaster.
  • The Asian population is larger in Riverhead at 5% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Riverhead at 15% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 3%, compared to 0% in Riverhead.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Riverhead and Lancaster at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Riverhead Lancaster
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.6%
Depression Data is updating% 22.2%
Smoking Data is updating% 16.4%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.3%
Obesity Data is updating% 37.3%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Riverhead vs Lancaster

  • In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 22.2% versus 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lancaster at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Riverhead Lancaster
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.5% (164)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 20.9% (2,244)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.0% (1,823)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 26.3% (2,823)

Education Levels Comparison: Riverhead vs Lancaster

  • In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 17.0%, compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.