Demographics details for Riverdale, GA vs Pulaski, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverdale, GA vs Pulaski, VA.
| Data | Riverdale | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,715 | 33,706 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 47.2 years |
| Median Income | $61,622 | $59,740 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Riverdale vs Pulaski
- The population in Pulaski is higher at 33,706, compared to 14,715 in Riverdale.
- The median age in Pulaski is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 37.4 years in Riverdale.
- Riverdale has a higher median income of $61,622 compared to $59,740 in Pulaski.
- In Pulaski, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 28.0% in Riverdale.
- Riverdale has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Pulaski.
- The unemployment rate in Riverdale is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.9% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Riverdale vs Pulaski provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Riverdale | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 86 | 5 |
| White | 1 | 90 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riverdale vs Pulaski
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Riverdale at 86% compared to 5% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pulaski at 90% compared to 1% in Riverdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverdale at 7% compared to 1% in Pulaski.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riverdale at 3% compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Riverdale at 3% compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Riverdale and Pulaski at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Riverdale | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 15.9% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 37.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverdale vs Pulaski
- In Pulaski, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.2% in Riverdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pulaski at 24.8% versus 15.9% in Riverdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Riverdale at 19.2% compared to 18.5% in Pulaski.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pulaski at 18.2% compared to 12.5% in Riverdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Riverdale at 44.0% compared to 37.7% in Pulaski.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Riverdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Riverdale | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (457) | 1.0% (331) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (2,693) | 21.0% (7,088) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (1,434) | 14.0% (4,706) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (1,805) | 16.0% (5,382) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverdale vs Pulaski
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverdale have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.0% in Pulaski.
- In Pulaski, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 18.3% in Riverdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pulaski at 14.0%, compared to 9.7% in Riverdale.
- In Pulaski, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 12.3% in Riverdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.