Demographics details for Riverdale, GA vs Charlotte, VT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverdale, GA vs Charlotte, VT.
Data | Riverdale | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,715 | 3,754 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 43.0 years |
Median Income | $61,622 | $87,300 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 1.7 |
Population Comparison: Riverdale vs Charlotte
- In Riverdale, the population is higher at 14,715, compared to 3,754 in Charlotte.
- The median age in Charlotte is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 37.4 years in Riverdale.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $87,300, compared to $61,622 in Riverdale.
- In Charlotte, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 28.0% in Riverdale.
- Riverdale has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 6% in Charlotte.
- The unemployment rate in Riverdale is higher at 4.0%, compared to 1.7% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Riverdale vs Charlotte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Riverdale | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
Black | 86 | 1 |
White | 1 | 96 |
Asian | 7 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riverdale vs Charlotte
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Riverdale at 86% compared to 1% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Charlotte at 96% compared to 1% in Riverdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverdale at 7% compared to 2% in Charlotte.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riverdale at 3% compared to 1% in Charlotte.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Riverdale at 3% compared to 0% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Riverdale and Charlotte at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Riverdale | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 15.9% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 19.2% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 12.5% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 44.0% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverdale vs Charlotte
- More residents in Riverdale report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Charlotte.
- Depression is more prevalent in Riverdale at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Charlotte.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Riverdale at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Charlotte.
- Binge drinking is more common in Riverdale at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Charlotte.
- Obesity rates are higher in Riverdale at 44.0% compared to 0.0% in Charlotte.
- Disability percentages are higher in Riverdale at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Charlotte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Riverdale | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.1% (457) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (2,693) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (1,434) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (1,805) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverdale vs Charlotte
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverdale have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.0% in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverdale hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Charlotte.
- More residents in Riverdale have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 0.0% in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 0.0% in Charlotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.