Demographics details for Riverdale, GA vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverdale, GA vs Cambridge, OH.
Data | Riverdale | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,715 | 9,985 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $61,622 | $39,589 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Riverdale vs Cambridge
- In Riverdale, the population is higher at 14,715, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Riverdale have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Riverdale has a higher median income of $61,622 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Riverdale and Cambridge at 28.0%.
- Riverdale has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 16% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Riverdale.
Demographics
Demographics Riverdale vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Riverdale | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 86 | 6 |
White | 1 | 88 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riverdale vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Riverdale at 86% compared to 6% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to 1% in Riverdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverdale at 7% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riverdale at 3% compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cambridge at 4%, compared to 3% in Riverdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Riverdale and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Riverdale | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 20.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 15.1% |
Depression | 15.9% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 26.2% |
Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 44.0% | 46.4% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverdale vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.2% in Riverdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 15.9% in Riverdale.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 19.2% in Riverdale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 12.5% in Riverdale.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 44.0% in Riverdale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Riverdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Riverdale | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.1% (457) | 0.7% (73) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (2,693) | 25.1% (2,502) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (1,434) | 17.3% (1,732) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (1,805) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverdale vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverdale have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 18.3% in Riverdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 17.3%, compared to 9.7% in Riverdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.