Demographics details for Riverbank, CA vs Yakima, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverbank, CA vs Yakima, WA.
Data | Riverbank | Yakima |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,826 | 97,012 |
Median Age | 33.6 years | 33.9 years |
Median Income | $89,504 | $55,734 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Riverbank vs Yakima
- The population in Yakima is higher at 97,012, compared to 24,826 in Riverbank.
- The median age in Yakima is higher at 33.9 years, compared to 33.6 years in Riverbank.
- Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504 compared to $55,734 in Yakima.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Riverbank at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Yakima.
- The poverty level is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 10% in Riverbank.
- Yakima has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 5.2% in Riverbank.
Demographics
Demographics Riverbank vs Yakima provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Riverbank | Yakima |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 13 | 34 |
Asian | 6 | 1 |
Hispanic | 55 | 47 |
Two or More Races | 23 | 16 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Riverbank vs Yakima
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Riverbank and Yakima at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Yakima at 34% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverbank at 6% compared to 1% in Yakima.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riverbank at 55% compared to 47% in Yakima.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Riverbank at 23% compared to 16% in Yakima.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Riverbank at 2% compared to 1% in Yakima.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Riverbank | Yakima |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.7% |
Depression | 21.0% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 15.0% | 17.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 15.4% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverbank vs Yakima
- In Yakima, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.2% in Riverbank.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Yakima at 23.6% versus 21.0% in Riverbank.
- Yakima has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 15.0% in Riverbank.
- Binge drinking is more common in Riverbank at 16.4% compared to 15.4% in Yakima.
- Yakima has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 35.0% in Riverbank.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yakima at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Riverbank | Yakima |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.1% (766) | 1.8% (1,748) |
High School Diploma | 15.2% (3,764) | 13.4% (12,983) |
Less than High School | 22.2% (5,505) | 27.9% (27,106) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (2,804) | 12.1% (11,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverbank vs Yakima
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverbank have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.8% in Yakima.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverbank hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 13.4% in Yakima.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yakima at 27.9%, compared to 22.2% in Riverbank.
- In Yakima, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.