Demographics details for Riverbank, CA vs Lancaster, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverbank, CA vs Lancaster, VA.
| Data | Riverbank | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,826 | 10,750 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 59.2 years |
| Median Income | $89,504 | $62,674 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Riverbank vs Lancaster
- In Riverbank, the population is higher at 24,826, compared to 10,750 in Lancaster.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 59.2 years, compared to 33.6 years in Riverbank.
- Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504 compared to $62,674 in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 38.0% in Riverbank.
- The poverty level is identical in both Riverbank and Lancaster at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Riverbank is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Riverbank vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Riverbank | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 28 |
| White | 13 | 66 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 55 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 3 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riverbank vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 1% in Riverbank.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lancaster at 66% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverbank at 6% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riverbank at 55% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Riverbank at 23% compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Riverbank at 2% compared to 0% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Riverbank | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverbank vs Lancaster
- More residents in Riverbank report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 22.2% versus 21.0% in Riverbank.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 15.0% in Riverbank.
- Binge drinking is more common in Riverbank at 16.4% compared to 16.3% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 35.0% in Riverbank.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Riverbank | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (766) | 1.5% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (3,764) | 20.9% (2,244) |
| Less than High School | 22.2% (5,505) | 17.0% (1,823) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (2,804) | 26.3% (2,823) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverbank vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverbank have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.5% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 15.2% in Riverbank.
- More residents in Riverbank have less than a high school education at 22.2% compared to 17.0% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.