Demographics details for Riverbank, CA vs Lake leelanau, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Riverbank, CA vs Lake leelanau, MI.

Data Riverbank Lake leelanau
Population 24,826 165
Median Age 33.6 years 27.9 years
Median Income $89,504 $48,125
Married Families 38.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.1

Population Comparison: Riverbank vs Lake leelanau

  • In Riverbank, the population is higher at 24,826, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
  • Residents in Riverbank have a higher median age of 33.6 years compared to 27.9 years in Lake leelanau.
  • Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504 compared to $48,125 in Lake leelanau.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Riverbank at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Lake leelanau.
  • Riverbank has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Lake leelanau.
  • The unemployment rate in Riverbank is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.1% in Lake leelanau.

Demographics

Demographics Riverbank vs Lake leelanau provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Riverbank Lake leelanau
Black 1 Data is updating
White 13 100
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 55 Data is updating
Two or More Races 23 Data is updating
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Riverbank vs Lake leelanau

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Riverbank at 1% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake leelanau at 100% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
  • The Asian population is larger in Riverbank at 6% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Riverbank at 55% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Riverbank at 23% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Riverbank at 2% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Riverbank Lake leelanau
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 8.4%
Depression 21.0% 22.5%
Smoking 15.0% 12.5%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 18.9%
Obesity 35.0% 31.7%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Riverbank vs Lake leelanau

  • More residents in Riverbank report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 14.4% in Lake leelanau.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lake leelanau at 22.5% versus 21.0% in Riverbank.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Riverbank at 15.0% compared to 12.5% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 16.4% in Riverbank.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Riverbank at 35.0% compared to 31.7% in Lake leelanau.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake leelanau at 24.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Riverbank Lake leelanau
No Schooling 3.1% (766) 2.4% (4)
High School Diploma 15.2% (3,764) 13.3% (22)
Less than High School 22.2% (5,505) 4.8% (8)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (2,804) 13.9% (23)

Education Levels Comparison: Riverbank vs Lake leelanau

  • A higher percentage of residents in Riverbank have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.4% in Lake leelanau.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Riverbank hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 13.3% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents in Riverbank have less than a high school education at 22.2% compared to 4.8% in Lake leelanau.
  • In Lake leelanau, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.