Demographics details for Riverbank, CA vs Junction city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Riverbank, CA vs Junction city, KS.

Data Riverbank Junction city
Population 24,826 22,264
Median Age 33.6 years 28.5 years
Median Income $89,504 $60,709
Married Families 38.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 10% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.8

Population Comparison: Riverbank vs Junction city

  • In Riverbank, the population is higher at 24,826, compared to 22,264 in Junction city.
  • Residents in Riverbank have a higher median age of 33.6 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
  • Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504 compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Riverbank.
  • The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 10% in Riverbank.
  • The unemployment rate in Riverbank is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.8% in Junction city.

Demographics

Demographics Riverbank vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Riverbank Junction city
Black 1 20
White 13 43
Asian 6 3
Hispanic 55 18
Two or More Races 23 15
American Indian 2 1

Demographics Comparison: Riverbank vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 1% in Riverbank.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Junction city at 43% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
  • The Asian population is larger in Riverbank at 6% compared to 3% in Junction city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Riverbank at 55% compared to 18% in Junction city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Riverbank at 23% compared to 15% in Junction city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Riverbank at 2% compared to 1% in Junction city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Riverbank Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 11.0%
Depression 21.0% 19.2%
Smoking 15.0% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 16.6%
Obesity 35.0% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Riverbank vs Junction city

  • More residents in Riverbank report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Riverbank at 21.0% compared to 19.2% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 15.0% in Riverbank.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Junction city at 16.6% compared to 16.4% in Riverbank.
  • Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 35.0% in Riverbank.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction city at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Riverbank Junction city
No Schooling 3.1% (766) 1.0% (216)
High School Diploma 15.2% (3,764) 12.4% (2,755)
Less than High School 22.2% (5,505) 6.9% (1,535)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (2,804) 13.2% (2,941)

Education Levels Comparison: Riverbank vs Junction city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Riverbank have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.0% in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Riverbank hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
  • More residents in Riverbank have less than a high school education at 22.2% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.