Demographics details for Riverbank, CA vs Bethlehem, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverbank, CA vs Bethlehem, PA.
| Data | Riverbank | Bethlehem |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,826 | 77,617 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $89,504 | $62,072 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Riverbank vs Bethlehem
- The population in Bethlehem is higher at 77,617, compared to 24,826 in Riverbank.
- The median age in Bethlehem is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 33.6 years in Riverbank.
- Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504 compared to $62,072 in Bethlehem.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Riverbank at 38.0% compared to 29.0% in Bethlehem.
- The poverty level is higher in Bethlehem at 13%, compared to 10% in Riverbank.
- The unemployment rate in Riverbank is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Bethlehem.
Demographics
Demographics Riverbank vs Bethlehem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Riverbank | Bethlehem |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 9 |
| White | 13 | 47 |
| Asian | 6 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 55 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 11 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riverbank vs Bethlehem
- In Bethlehem, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Riverbank.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bethlehem at 47% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverbank at 6% compared to 3% in Bethlehem.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riverbank at 55% compared to 30% in Bethlehem.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Riverbank at 23% compared to 11% in Bethlehem.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Riverbank at 2% compared to 0% in Bethlehem.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Riverbank | Bethlehem |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverbank vs Bethlehem
- More residents in Riverbank report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Bethlehem.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bethlehem at 21.8% versus 21.0% in Riverbank.
- Bethlehem has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 15.0% in Riverbank.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bethlehem at 17.6% compared to 16.4% in Riverbank.
- Obesity rates are higher in Riverbank at 35.0% compared to 34.7% in Bethlehem.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bethlehem at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Riverbank | Bethlehem |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (766) | 0.6% (452) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (3,764) | 16.9% (13,125) |
| Less than High School | 22.2% (5,505) | 12.9% (10,045) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (2,804) | 22.0% (17,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverbank vs Bethlehem
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverbank have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.6% in Bethlehem.
- In Bethlehem, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 15.2% in Riverbank.
- More residents in Riverbank have less than a high school education at 22.2% compared to 12.9% in Bethlehem.
- In Bethlehem, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.