Demographics details for River rouge, MI vs Norway, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in River rouge, MI vs Norway, IA.
| Data | River rouge | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,040 | 466 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 48.3 years |
| Median Income | $26,343 | $90,000 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 32% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 12.3 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: River rouge vs Norway
- In River rouge, the population is higher at 7,040, compared to 466 in Norway.
- The median age in Norway is higher at 48.3 years, compared to 34.9 years in River rouge.
- Norway has a higher median income of $90,000, compared to $26,343 in River rouge.
- In Norway, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 21.0% in River rouge.
- River rouge has a higher poverty level at 32% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The unemployment rate in River rouge is higher at 12.3%, compared to 2.5% in Norway.
Demographics
Demographics River rouge vs Norway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | River rouge | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 47 | Data is updating |
| White | 21 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 16 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: River rouge vs Norway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in River rouge at 47% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norway at 100% compared to 21% in River rouge.
- Both River rouge and Norway have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in River rouge at 16% compared to 0% in Norway.
- More residents identify as two or more races in River rouge at 16% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both River rouge and Norway at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | River rouge | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.4% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.3% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 32.8% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 22.9% |
| Obesity | 44.1% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: River rouge vs Norway
- More residents in River rouge report poor mental health at 22.4% compared to 14.2% in Norway.
- Depression is more prevalent in River rouge at 25.0% compared to 17.5% in Norway.
- Smoking is more prevalent in River rouge at 32.8% compared to 14.7% in Norway.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norway at 22.9% compared to 13.9% in River rouge.
- Obesity rates are higher in River rouge at 44.1% compared to 36.8% in Norway.
- Disability percentages are higher in River rouge at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Norway.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | River rouge | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (167) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 23.7% (1,667) | 33.5% (156) |
| Less than High School | 21.2% (1,491) | 5.6% (26) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.5% (389) | 10.5% (49) |
Education Levels Comparison: River rouge vs Norway
- A higher percentage of residents in River rouge have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- In Norway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.5% compared to 23.7% in River rouge.
- More residents in River rouge have less than a high school education at 21.2% compared to 5.6% in Norway.
- In Norway, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 5.5% in River rouge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.