Demographics details for River rouge, MI vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in River rouge, MI vs Ash fork, AZ.
Data | River rouge | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,040 | 466 |
Median Age | 34.9 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $26,343 | $79,861 |
Married Families | 21.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 32% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 12.3 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: River rouge vs Ash fork
- In River rouge, the population is higher at 7,040, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- The median age in Ash fork is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 34.9 years in River rouge.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861, compared to $26,343 in River rouge.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 21.0% in River rouge.
- River rouge has a higher poverty level at 32% compared to 10% in Ash fork.
- The unemployment rate in River rouge is higher at 12.3%, compared to 4.1% in Ash fork.
Demographics
Demographics River rouge vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | River rouge | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 47 | Data is updating |
White | 21 | 79 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 16 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: River rouge vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in River rouge at 47% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ash fork at 79% compared to 21% in River rouge.
- Both River rouge and Ash fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in River rouge at 16% compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in River rouge at 16% compared to 15% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both River rouge and Ash fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | River rouge | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.4% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 18.3% | 13.2% |
Depression | 25.0% | 21.4% |
Smoking | 32.8% | 19.3% |
Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 44.1% | 30.6% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: River rouge vs Ash fork
- More residents in River rouge report poor mental health at 22.4% compared to 18.4% in Ash fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in River rouge at 25.0% compared to 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in River rouge at 32.8% compared to 19.3% in Ash fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ash fork at 15.9% compared to 13.9% in River rouge.
- Obesity rates are higher in River rouge at 44.1% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 20.0% in River rouge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | River rouge | Ash fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (167) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 23.7% (1,667) | 13.1% (61) |
Less than High School | 21.2% (1,491) | 23.6% (110) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.5% (389) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: River rouge vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of residents in River rouge have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in River rouge hold a high school diploma at 23.7% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 21.2% in River rouge.
- In Ash fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 5.5% in River rouge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.