Demographics details for River falls, WI vs Lugoff, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in River falls, WI vs Lugoff, SC.
| Data | River falls | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,609 | 9,423 |
| Median Age | 26.8 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $72,247 | $57,885 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: River falls vs Lugoff
- In River falls, the population is higher at 16,609, compared to 9,423 in Lugoff.
- The median age in Lugoff is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 26.8 years in River falls.
- River falls has a higher median income of $72,247 compared to $57,885 in Lugoff.
- In Lugoff, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 29.0% in River falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Lugoff at 9%, compared to 7% in River falls.
- Lugoff has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 2.5% in River falls.
Demographics
Demographics River falls vs Lugoff provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | River falls | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 21 |
| White | 91 | 73 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: River falls vs Lugoff
- In Lugoff, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 1% in River falls.
- River falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 73% in Lugoff.
- The Asian population is larger in River falls at 2% compared to 0% in Lugoff.
- Lugoff has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in River falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in River falls at 4% compared to 3% in Lugoff.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both River falls and Lugoff at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | River falls | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.3% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: River falls vs Lugoff
- In Lugoff, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.0% in River falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in River falls at 23.6% compared to 22.5% in Lugoff.
- Lugoff has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 14.7% in River falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in River falls at 24.3% compared to 16.7% in Lugoff.
- Obesity rates are higher in River falls at 35.7% compared to 34.1% in Lugoff.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lugoff at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in River falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | River falls | Lugoff |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (83) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (1,480) | 19.6% (1,843) |
| Less than High School | 2.6% (439) | 8.3% (778) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.9% (3,640) | 16.3% (1,537) |
Education Levels Comparison: River falls vs Lugoff
- In Lugoff, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in River falls.
- In Lugoff, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 8.9% in River falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lugoff at 8.3%, compared to 2.6% in River falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in River falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 16.3% in Lugoff.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.