Demographics details for River falls, WI vs Central city, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in River falls, WI vs Central city, KY.

Data River falls Central city
Population 16,609 5,810
Median Age 26.8 years 33.5 years
Median Income $72,247 $52,184
Married Families 29.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 7% 16%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: River falls vs Central city

  • In River falls, the population is higher at 16,609, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
  • The median age in Central city is higher at 33.5 years, compared to 26.8 years in River falls.
  • River falls has a higher median income of $72,247 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
  • In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 29.0% in River falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 7% in River falls.
  • Central city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in River falls.

Demographics

Demographics River falls vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic River falls Central city
Black 1 3
White 91 88
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 2
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: River falls vs Central city

  • In Central city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in River falls.
  • River falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 88% in Central city.
  • The Asian population is larger in River falls at 2% compared to 0% in Central city.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both River falls and Central city at 2%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central city at 6%, compared to 4% in River falls.
  • In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in River falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric River falls Central city
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 15.5%
Depression 23.6% 26.8%
Smoking 14.7% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 24.3% 14.8%
Obesity 35.7% 41.9%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: River falls vs Central city

  • In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.0% in River falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 23.6% in River falls.
  • Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 14.7% in River falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in River falls at 24.3% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
  • Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 35.7% in River falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in River falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level River falls Central city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.1% (65)
High School Diploma 8.9% (1,480) 15.4% (897)
Less than High School 2.6% (439) 15.6% (905)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.9% (3,640) 8.3% (480)

Education Levels Comparison: River falls vs Central city

  • In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in River falls.
  • In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 8.9% in River falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 2.6% in River falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in River falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 8.3% in Central city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.