Demographics details for Rising city, NE vs Claremont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rising city, NE vs Claremont, CA.
Data | Rising city | Claremont |
---|---|---|
Population | 354 | 36,001 |
Median Age | 44.3 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $81,477 | $115,091 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Rising city vs Claremont
- The population in Claremont is higher at 36,001, compared to 354 in Rising city.
- Residents in Rising city have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 41.5 years in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091, compared to $81,477 in Rising city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rising city at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Claremont.
- Rising city has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 2.7% in Rising city.
Demographics
Demographics Rising city vs Claremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rising city | Claremont |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 6 |
White | 98 | 37 |
Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
Hispanic | 2 | 25 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rising city vs Claremont
- In Claremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Rising city.
- Rising city has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Rising city.
- Claremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 2% in Rising city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Claremont at 16%, compared to 0% in Rising city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rising city and Claremont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rising city | Claremont |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 14.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 8.5% |
Depression | 16.0% | 16.3% |
Smoking | 16.3% | 8.2% |
Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 24.5% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rising city vs Claremont
- In Claremont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.0% compared to 13.5% in Rising city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Claremont at 16.3% versus 16.0% in Rising city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rising city at 16.3% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rising city at 23.1% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rising city at 40.3% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rising city at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rising city | Claremont |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (403) |
High School Diploma | 19.8% (70) | 6.7% (2,427) |
Less than High School | 9.6% (34) | 6.2% (2,248) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.6% (27) | 39.5% (14,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rising city vs Claremont
- In Claremont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Rising city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rising city hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- More residents in Rising city have less than a high school education at 9.6% compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 7.6% in Rising city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.