Demographics details for Ripon, CA vs Conshohocken, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ripon, CA vs Conshohocken, PA.
Data | Ripon | Conshohocken |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,272 | 9,255 |
Median Age | 39.4 years | 32.3 years |
Median Income | $115,583 | $114,523 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ripon vs Conshohocken
- In Ripon, the population is higher at 16,272, compared to 9,255 in Conshohocken.
- Residents in Ripon have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 32.3 years in Conshohocken.
- Ripon has a higher median income of $115,583 compared to $114,523 in Conshohocken.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ripon at 46.0% compared to 39.0% in Conshohocken.
- Ripon has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Conshohocken.
- The unemployment rate in Ripon is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Conshohocken.
Demographics
Demographics Ripon vs Conshohocken provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ripon | Conshohocken |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 5 |
White | 57 | 86 |
Asian | 5 | 3 |
Hispanic | 25 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ripon vs Conshohocken
- In Conshohocken, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Ripon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Conshohocken at 86% compared to 57% in Ripon.
- The Asian population is larger in Ripon at 5% compared to 3% in Conshohocken.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ripon at 25% compared to 2% in Conshohocken.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ripon at 11% compared to 4% in Conshohocken.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ripon at 1% compared to 0% in Conshohocken.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ripon | Conshohocken |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.4% |
Depression | 18.9% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 12.5% | 11.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 32.3% | 30.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ripon vs Conshohocken
- More residents in Ripon report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 13.8% in Conshohocken.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Conshohocken at 20.1% versus 18.9% in Ripon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ripon at 12.5% compared to 11.6% in Conshohocken.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Conshohocken at 19.4% compared to 17.9% in Ripon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ripon at 32.3% compared to 30.2% in Conshohocken.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ripon at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Conshohocken.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ripon | Conshohocken |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (122) | 0.3% (26) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (2,151) | 14.0% (1,292) |
Less than High School | 12.5% (2,033) | 4.2% (388) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (2,700) | 50.2% (4,643) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ripon vs Conshohocken
- A higher percentage of residents in Ripon have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Conshohocken.
- In Conshohocken, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.0% compared to 13.2% in Ripon.
- More residents in Ripon have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 4.2% in Conshohocken.
- In Conshohocken, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.2% compared to 16.6% in Ripon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.