Demographics details for Ripley, TN vs Potts camp, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ripley, TN vs Potts camp, MS.
| Data | Ripley | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,672 | 409 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 45.6 years |
| Median Income | $39,454 | $21,845 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Ripley vs Potts camp
- In Ripley, the population is higher at 7,672, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
- The median age in Potts camp is higher at 45.6 years, compared to 36.7 years in Ripley.
- Ripley has a higher median income of $39,454 compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ripley at 26.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
- The poverty level is higher in Potts camp at 25%, compared to 18% in Ripley.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Ripley and Potts camp at 5.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Ripley vs Potts camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ripley | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 58 | 13 |
| White | 37 | 80 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ripley vs Potts camp
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ripley at 58% compared to 13% in Potts camp.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Potts camp at 80% compared to 37% in Ripley.
- Both Ripley and Potts camp have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ripley at 1% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Potts camp at 7%, compared to 4% in Ripley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ripley and Potts camp at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ripley | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 23.0% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.9% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 27.8% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 30.2% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.9% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ripley vs Potts camp
- More residents in Ripley report poor mental health at 23.0% compared to 17.4% in Potts camp.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ripley at 27.8% compared to 23.0% in Potts camp.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ripley at 30.2% compared to 21.7% in Potts camp.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Potts camp at 13.8% compared to 11.9% in Ripley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ripley at 45.0% compared to 41.8% in Potts camp.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ripley at 25.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ripley | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (86) | 0.5% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (1,679) | 13.7% (56) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (1,172) | 12.0% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (632) | 8.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ripley vs Potts camp
- A higher percentage of residents in Ripley have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ripley hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
- More residents in Ripley have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 12.0% in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ripley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.2% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.