Demographics details for Ripley, TN vs Lost hills, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ripley, TN vs Lost hills, CA.

Data Ripley Lost hills
Population 7,672 1,754
Median Age 36.7 years 23.8 years
Median Income $39,454 $41,250
Married Families 26.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 18% 22%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Ripley vs Lost hills

  • In Ripley, the population is higher at 7,672, compared to 1,754 in Lost hills.
  • Residents in Ripley have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 23.8 years in Lost hills.
  • Lost hills has a higher median income of $41,250, compared to $39,454 in Ripley.
  • In Lost hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 26.0% in Ripley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lost hills at 22%, compared to 18% in Ripley.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Ripley and Lost hills at 5.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Ripley vs Lost hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ripley Lost hills
Black 58 Data is updating
White 37 -35
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 1 97
Two or More Races 4 37
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Ripley vs Lost hills

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ripley at 58% compared to 0% in Lost hills.
  • Ripley has a higher percentage of White residents at 37% compared to -35% in Lost hills.
  • In Lost hills, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ripley.
  • Lost hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 1% in Ripley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lost hills at 37%, compared to 4% in Ripley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ripley and Lost hills at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ripley Lost hills
Mental Health Not Good 23.0% 19.6%
Physical Health Not Good 17.9% 19.8%
Depression 27.8% 18.9%
Smoking 30.2% 20.9%
Binge Drinking 11.9% 13.6%
Obesity 45.0% 43.3%
Disability Percentage 25.0% 4.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ripley vs Lost hills

  • More residents in Ripley report poor mental health at 23.0% compared to 19.6% in Lost hills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Ripley at 27.8% compared to 18.9% in Lost hills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Ripley at 30.2% compared to 20.9% in Lost hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lost hills at 13.6% compared to 11.9% in Ripley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Ripley at 45.0% compared to 43.3% in Lost hills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Ripley at 25.0% compared to 4.0% in Lost hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ripley Lost hills
No Schooling 1.1% (86) 3.7% (65)
High School Diploma 21.9% (1,679) 10.0% (175)
Less than High School 15.3% (1,172) 64.7% (1,134)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.2% (632) 0.9% (16)

Education Levels Comparison: Ripley vs Lost hills

  • In Lost hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.1% in Ripley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Ripley hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 10.0% in Lost hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lost hills at 64.7%, compared to 15.3% in Ripley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Ripley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.2% compared to 0.9% in Lost hills.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.