Demographics details for Ripley, TN vs Falls church, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ripley, TN vs Falls church, VA.
| Data | Ripley | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,672 | 14,586 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $39,454 | $164,536 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Ripley vs Falls church
- The population in Falls church is higher at 14,586, compared to 7,672 in Ripley.
- The median age in Falls church is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 36.7 years in Ripley.
- Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536, compared to $39,454 in Ripley.
- In Falls church, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 26.0% in Ripley.
- Ripley has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 6% in Falls church.
- The unemployment rate in Ripley is higher at 5.2%, compared to 2.5% in Falls church.
Demographics
Demographics Ripley vs Falls church provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ripley | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 58 | 5 |
| White | 37 | 65 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ripley vs Falls church
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ripley at 58% compared to 5% in Falls church.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Falls church at 65% compared to 37% in Ripley.
- In Falls church, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Ripley.
- Falls church has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 1% in Ripley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Falls church at 10%, compared to 4% in Ripley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ripley and Falls church at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ripley | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 23.0% | 11.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.9% | 6.5% |
| Depression | 27.8% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 30.2% | 7.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.9% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 30.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ripley vs Falls church
- More residents in Ripley report poor mental health at 23.0% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ripley at 27.8% compared to 19.9% in Falls church.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ripley at 30.2% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Falls church at 18.8% compared to 11.9% in Ripley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ripley at 45.0% compared to 30.8% in Falls church.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ripley at 25.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ripley | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (86) | 0.3% (50) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (1,679) | 4.1% (597) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (1,172) | 2.7% (388) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (632) | 52.5% (7,660) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ripley vs Falls church
- A higher percentage of residents in Ripley have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Falls church.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ripley hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
- More residents in Ripley have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
- In Falls church, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 8.2% in Ripley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.