Demographics details for Ripley, TN vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ripley, TN vs Cambridge, OH.
| Data | Ripley | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,672 | 9,985 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $39,454 | $39,589 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Ripley vs Cambridge
- The population in Cambridge is higher at 9,985, compared to 7,672 in Ripley.
- Residents in Ripley have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $39,589, compared to $39,454 in Ripley.
- In Cambridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 26.0% in Ripley.
- Ripley has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 16% in Cambridge.
- The unemployment rate in Ripley is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Ripley vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ripley | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 58 | 6 |
| White | 37 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ripley vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ripley at 58% compared to 6% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to 37% in Ripley.
- Both Ripley and Cambridge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Ripley.
- Both Ripley and Cambridge have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ripley and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ripley | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 23.0% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 27.8% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 30.2% | 26.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.9% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 46.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ripley vs Cambridge
- More residents in Ripley report poor mental health at 23.0% compared to 20.4% in Cambridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ripley at 27.8% compared to 25.9% in Cambridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ripley at 30.2% compared to 26.2% in Cambridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 11.9% in Ripley.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 45.0% in Ripley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ripley at 25.0% compared to 19.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ripley | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (86) | 0.7% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (1,679) | 25.1% (2,502) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (1,172) | 17.3% (1,732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (632) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ripley vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Ripley have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 21.9% in Ripley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 17.3%, compared to 15.3% in Ripley.
- In Cambridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 8.2% in Ripley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.