Demographics details for Rio vista, TX vs Clayton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rio vista, TX vs Clayton, OH.
| Data | Rio vista | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,168 | 13,235 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $68,078 | $89,282 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rio vista vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 13,235, compared to 1,168 in Rio vista.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 29.8 years in Rio vista.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282, compared to $68,078 in Rio vista.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 44.0% in Rio vista.
- Rio vista has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Rio vista is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Rio vista vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rio vista | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 30 |
| White | 94 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rio vista vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 0% in Rio vista.
- Rio vista has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Rio vista.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Rio vista and Clayton at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 3% in Rio vista.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rio vista at 1% compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rio vista | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 34.5% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rio vista vs Clayton
- More residents in Rio vista report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 24.4% versus 24.1% in Rio vista.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rio vista at 17.9% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rio vista at 19.3% compared to 18.9% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 34.5% in Rio vista.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Rio vista.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rio vista | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (12) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 32.0% (374) | 17.9% (2,371) |
| Less than High School | 7.5% (88) | 5.6% (746) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (96) | 26.3% (3,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rio vista vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio vista have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio vista hold a high school diploma at 32.0% compared to 17.9% in Clayton.
- More residents in Rio vista have less than a high school education at 7.5% compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 8.2% in Rio vista.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.