Demographics details for Rio rico, AZ vs Brookhaven, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rio rico, AZ vs Brookhaven, MS.
Data | Rio rico | Brookhaven |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,447 | 11,608 |
Median Age | 33.8 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $62,537 | $32,869 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Rio rico vs Brookhaven
- In Rio rico, the population is higher at 21,447, compared to 11,608 in Brookhaven.
- The median age in Brookhaven is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 33.8 years in Rio rico.
- Rio rico has a higher median income of $62,537 compared to $32,869 in Brookhaven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rio rico at 40.0% compared to 28.0% in Brookhaven.
- The poverty level is higher in Brookhaven at 20%, compared to 12% in Rio rico.
- Brookhaven has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.3% in Rio rico.
Demographics
Demographics Rio rico vs Brookhaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rio rico | Brookhaven |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 57 |
White | -24 | 39 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 87 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 36 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rio rico vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 0% in Rio rico.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brookhaven at 39% compared to -24% in Rio rico.
- In Brookhaven, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Rio rico.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rio rico at 87% compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rio rico at 36% compared to 0% in Brookhaven.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rio rico at 1% compared to 0% in Brookhaven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rio rico | Brookhaven |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.6% |
Depression | 19.0% | 21.5% |
Smoking | 14.3% | 21.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 12.4% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 45.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rio rico vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.8% in Rio rico.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brookhaven at 21.5% versus 19.0% in Rio rico.
- Brookhaven has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 14.3% in Rio rico.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rio rico at 17.2% compared to 12.4% in Brookhaven.
- Brookhaven has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 34.9% in Rio rico.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brookhaven at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Rio rico.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rio rico | Brookhaven |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (243) | 0.8% (96) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (2,980) | 19.7% (2,281) |
Less than High School | 20.0% (4,286) | 11.7% (1,357) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (2,979) | 14.6% (1,696) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rio rico vs Brookhaven
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio rico have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Brookhaven.
- In Brookhaven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 13.9% in Rio rico.
- More residents in Rio rico have less than a high school education at 20.0% compared to 11.7% in Brookhaven.
- In Brookhaven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 13.9% in Rio rico.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.