Demographics details for Rio rancho, NM vs Xenia, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rio rancho, NM vs Xenia, OH.

Data Rio rancho Xenia
Population 108,082 25,612
Median Age 39.0 years 38.7 years
Median Income $78,978 $53,041
Married Families 41.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 5.8

Population Comparison: Rio rancho vs Xenia

  • In Rio rancho, the population is higher at 108,082, compared to 25,612 in Xenia.
  • Residents in Rio rancho have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 38.7 years in Xenia.
  • Rio rancho has a higher median income of $78,978 compared to $53,041 in Xenia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rio rancho at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Xenia.
  • The poverty level is higher in Xenia at 13%, compared to 12% in Rio rancho.
  • Xenia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.6% in Rio rancho.

Demographics

Demographics Rio rancho vs Xenia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rio rancho Xenia
Black 3 10
White 34 80
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 42 3
Two or More Races 16 6
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rio rancho vs Xenia

  • In Xenia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 3% in Rio rancho.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Xenia at 80% compared to 34% in Rio rancho.
  • The Asian population is larger in Rio rancho at 2% compared to 1% in Xenia.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Rio rancho at 42% compared to 3% in Xenia.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Rio rancho at 16% compared to 6% in Xenia.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rio rancho at 3% compared to 0% in Xenia.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rio rancho Xenia
Mental Health Not Good 14.9% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% 12.8%
Depression 19.9% 23.5%
Smoking 13.0% 21.7%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 16.3%
Obesity 33.5% 41.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rio rancho vs Xenia

  • In Xenia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.9% in Rio rancho.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Xenia at 23.5% versus 19.9% in Rio rancho.
  • Xenia has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 13.0% in Rio rancho.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Xenia at 16.3% compared to 15.1% in Rio rancho.
  • Xenia has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 33.5% in Rio rancho.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Xenia at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Rio rancho.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rio rancho Xenia
No Schooling 0.5% (565) 0.3% (79)
High School Diploma 12.3% (13,278) 20.4% (5,228)
Less than High School 6.6% (7,178) 14.0% (3,588)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.7% (23,453) 14.9% (3,808)

Education Levels Comparison: Rio rancho vs Xenia

  • A higher percentage of residents in Rio rancho have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Xenia.
  • In Xenia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 12.3% in Rio rancho.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Xenia at 14.0%, compared to 6.6% in Rio rancho.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rio rancho hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 14.9% in Xenia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.