Demographics details for Rio rancho, NM vs Thornton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rio rancho, NM vs Thornton, CO.
| Data | Rio rancho | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,082 | 143,282 |
| Median Age | 39.0 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $78,978 | $95,064 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rio rancho vs Thornton
- The population in Thornton is higher at 143,282, compared to 108,082 in Rio rancho.
- Residents in Rio rancho have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 33.7 years in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher median income of $95,064, compared to $78,978 in Rio rancho.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rio rancho at 41.0% compared to 40.0% in Thornton.
- Rio rancho has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Thornton.
- The unemployment rate in Rio rancho is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.2% in Thornton.
Demographics
Demographics Rio rancho vs Thornton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rio rancho | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 34 | 39 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 42 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 15 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rio rancho vs Thornton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rio rancho at 3% compared to 2% in Thornton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Thornton at 39% compared to 34% in Rio rancho.
- In Thornton, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Rio rancho.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rio rancho at 42% compared to 37% in Thornton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rio rancho at 16% compared to 15% in Thornton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rio rancho at 3% compared to 1% in Thornton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rio rancho | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 21.0% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rio rancho vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.9% in Rio rancho.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Thornton at 22.0% versus 19.9% in Rio rancho.
- Thornton has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 13.0% in Rio rancho.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 15.1% in Rio rancho.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rio rancho at 33.5% compared to 30.1% in Thornton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rio rancho at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Thornton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rio rancho | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (565) | 1.7% (2,448) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (13,278) | 13.2% (18,983) |
| Less than High School | 6.6% (7,178) | 14.7% (20,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (23,453) | 19.3% (27,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rio rancho vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Rio rancho.
- In Thornton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 12.3% in Rio rancho.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Thornton at 14.7%, compared to 6.6% in Rio rancho.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio rancho hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 19.3% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.