Demographics details for Rio rancho, NM vs Clayton, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rio rancho, NM vs Clayton, OK.
| Data | Rio rancho | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,082 | 555 |
| Median Age | 39.0 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $78,978 | $27,083 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rio rancho vs Clayton
- In Rio rancho, the population is higher at 108,082, compared to 555 in Clayton.
- Residents in Rio rancho have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 32.7 years in Clayton.
- Rio rancho has a higher median income of $78,978 compared to $27,083 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rio rancho at 41.0% compared to 31.0% in Clayton.
- Rio rancho has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Rio rancho is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Rio rancho vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rio rancho | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 34 | 51 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 42 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 23 |
| American Indian | 3 | 20 |
Demographics Comparison: Rio rancho vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rio rancho at 3% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 51% compared to 34% in Rio rancho.
- The Asian population is larger in Rio rancho at 2% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rio rancho at 42% compared to 4% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 23%, compared to 16% in Rio rancho.
- In Clayton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 20%, compared to 3% in Rio rancho.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rio rancho | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 21.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 28.8% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 26.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 37.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rio rancho vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 14.9% in Rio rancho.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 28.8% versus 19.9% in Rio rancho.
- Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 26.6% compared to 13.0% in Rio rancho.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rio rancho at 15.1% compared to 14.4% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 33.5% in Rio rancho.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 37.0% compared to 13.0% in Rio rancho.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rio rancho | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (565) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (13,278) | 37.5% (208) |
| Less than High School | 6.6% (7,178) | 19.5% (108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (23,453) | 6.7% (37) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rio rancho vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio rancho have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.5% compared to 12.3% in Rio rancho.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 19.5%, compared to 6.6% in Rio rancho.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio rancho hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 6.7% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.