Demographics details for Rio linda, CA vs Shrub oak, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rio linda, CA vs Shrub oak, NY.
| Data | Rio linda | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,596 | 3,002 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $88,102 | $128,832 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rio linda vs Shrub oak
- In Rio linda, the population is higher at 16,596, compared to 3,002 in Shrub oak.
- Residents in Rio linda have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 36.6 years in Shrub oak.
- Shrub oak has a higher median income of $128,832, compared to $88,102 in Rio linda.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rio linda at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in Shrub oak.
- Rio linda has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Shrub oak.
- The unemployment rate in Rio linda is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Shrub oak.
Demographics
Demographics Rio linda vs Shrub oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rio linda | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 60 | 64 |
| Asian | 7 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rio linda vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rio linda at 3% compared to 2% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shrub oak at 64% compared to 60% in Rio linda.
- In Shrub oak, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 7% in Rio linda.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rio linda at 23% compared to 18% in Shrub oak.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rio linda at 7% compared to 1% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rio linda and Shrub oak at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rio linda | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 25.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rio linda vs Shrub oak
- More residents in Rio linda report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 13.2% in Shrub oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rio linda at 21.4% compared to 19.7% in Shrub oak.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rio linda at 15.8% compared to 11.3% in Shrub oak.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shrub oak at 18.1% compared to 16.9% in Rio linda.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rio linda at 33.7% compared to 25.7% in Shrub oak.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Rio linda and Shrub oak at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rio linda | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (219) | 0.4% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (4,218) | 11.0% (330) |
| Less than High School | 14.9% (2,471) | 12.9% (387) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,529) | 38.9% (1,168) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rio linda vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio linda have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Shrub oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio linda hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
- More residents in Rio linda have less than a high school education at 14.9% compared to 12.9% in Shrub oak.
- In Shrub oak, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 9.2% in Rio linda.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.