Demographics details for Rio linda, CA vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rio linda, CA vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Rio linda | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,596 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $88,102 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Rio linda vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 16,596 in Rio linda.
- Residents in Rio linda have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Rio linda has a higher median income of $88,102 compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rio linda at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- Rio linda has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Rio linda is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Provo.
Demographics
Demographics Rio linda vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rio linda | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 60 | 69 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rio linda vs Provo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rio linda at 3% compared to 1% in Provo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Provo at 69% compared to 60% in Rio linda.
- The Asian population is larger in Rio linda at 7% compared to 2% in Provo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rio linda at 23% compared to 18% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 7% in Rio linda.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Rio linda.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rio linda | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rio linda vs Provo
- More residents in Rio linda report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 21.4% in Rio linda.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rio linda at 15.8% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rio linda at 16.9% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rio linda at 33.7% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rio linda at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rio linda | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (219) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (4,218) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 14.9% (2,471) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,529) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rio linda vs Provo
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio linda have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio linda hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Rio linda have less than a high school education at 14.9% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- In Provo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 9.2% in Rio linda.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.